Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Diving beneath the teacher's skirt

  • May. 11th, 2008 at 2:14 AM
winter 2005
Playboy is 97% dumb (it does deploy the subjunctive properly), and plastic postliterate women are as sexy as [extremely unsexy things]. I happened across this item, below, don't ask me how. Playboy Advisor has for decades dispensed wisdom to men and (some times) women. Even if the rest of the magazine is weird crap that panders to pleasurebot fetishists, Playboy Advisor is worth reading. The following wisdom applies aptly to me (except for the spread my seed part. not interested in spreading seed). I read it and thought, Well grow up you little punk. Then I thought: Oh. That's I, the serial dater. Yeah fool.

Yeah fool.
Yeah fool.

I own a copy of Playboy. It's from May 1968, the month I was born. A buddy got it for me for my birthday some years back. The picture on the front shows a woman who looks like somebody's mom. Like she could be baking cookies. Playboy Advisor then had much the same savoir faire as it has today. Maybe slightly more refined then. Some of the text is touching, like the advice for a young man whose best friend slept with the woman he (the young man) loved. Another fellow, a junior in college, asks whether he should wear a corsage to a formal or a semiformal, and should he send his girl a complimentary note a few days after the date? Incredibly sweet. Can you imagine a frat boy doing so much? There's a letter from a woman, a divorced mother of two (scandalous in '68), who asks advice about dating without subjecting her young children to the idea that she is anything other than a sexless and devoted mom. Playboy Advisor recognizes -- encourages -- both her sexual freedom and the considerate care of her children.

In a heartbreaking letter a woman asks -- asks Playboy Magazine! -- advice about what to do when she has already had two stillbirths, is pregnant again but the doctors predict the baby will die or have defects, and her husband is threatening to leave her to find a woman who can bear healthy children. Playboy Advisor returns a thoughtful and wise answer and finishes with, "If your husband is determined to abandon you in spite of everything, there is only the small consolation that if his love for you is so limited, you are better off without him."

There's a fascinating interview with Masters and Johnson in that issue. It's a good issue.

When last was Playboy sexy? When they had natural women. Ample, thin, firm, droopy, no matter, but real. Some of those women used to be readers too. Centerfold data included Favorite Book. I can't think when that was. They don't make that kind of Playboy anymore.

Notes:

1. When I was five, maybe six, we lived in Memphis on Avalon St and I found in a closet a big stack of my father's Playboys and smuggled all of them in five year old armloads (yippee!) to my room and hid them under the tent I had made from bed sheets till mom found them days later. Where did you find these? she asked me shocked. In the closet I said. I don't know what happened after that.

2. In kindergarten I had a pretty teacher who wore long skirts and one day we were all playing, all of we kids rambunctious in the classroom with the colors and shapes and words and pet snapping turtle in the clear glass bowl, and she strode among us to settle some rowdiness or dispute and I in the midst of that commotion took that moment to actually dive underneath her long orange skirt actually between her sandaled feet. I was small & impetuous. In a riotous moment. Instantly I was scared when I realized I had just dived under the teacher's skirt. She gasped and stepped back above me revealing me in my small impish opprobrium and laughed, embarrassed, and I was embarrassed too in my young way.

No, I won't be running for president, why do you ask? Lordy it's late. Night now.

tennessee mom
Tennesee mom, 1935.

Comments

(Anonymous) wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 10:44 am (UTC)
Thank you for that. You restore my faith in human beings and acknowledged human desire. I think that Playboy started off with noble intentions to liberate people's post-Victorian attitudes towards sex and their own bodies. I can remember the times when people used to claim to read it 'for the articles'. I haven't seen a Playboy in years and the last one I did 'read' was with an acquaintance familiar to you and I, both, in his shed. The irony was that I was far less interested in the articles than he. He was probably far more interested in the articles than in the centerfold...*sigh*
[info]lostvirtue wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 02:38 pm (UTC)
I know it's not fair to judge... BUT
I have my own share of sexual... oddities I guess... But I really despised the guys that bought "normal" porn at Borders. It was a lot of guys in pastel shirts, and suits.

a) Playboy and Penthouse SUCK
b) Good porn is available on the serious of tubes for free

I just really resented the type of guy that got off on playboy... to me it's a lack of creativity and sexual class..that's probably wrong, but I do. And I LIKE porn/erotic writing/and photos. Good porn that is. (obviously a taste issue)

If it makes this article anymore valid I also sorta resent woman who read only large quantities of romance novels. bad taste!
[info]ebourland wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 07:20 pm (UTC)
Re: I know it's not fair to judge... BUT
Go ahead and judge. ;-)
[info]lostvirtue wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 07:46 pm (UTC)
Re: I know it's not fair to judge... BUT
wow I made a lot of mistakes/typos in that comment... oh well
[info]asakiyume wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 03:00 pm (UTC)
Both those Playboy answers you write are thoughtful. People are so complicated, wanting so much, wanting contradictory things, but most of us have a huge streak of decency that just needs encouragement.

Where is your photo from? The mom is so very young. One brother has shoes on; the mother and the other brother are barefoot.

In "What Men Live By," by Tolstoy (one of the most moving stories I've ever read; can't think of it without tears), a man and his wife share the same coat--so only one can go outside in the winter at a time.
[info]ebourland wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 07:19 pm (UTC)
I get most of these photos from alt.vintage on Usenet. That's my mom raising us kids. Just kidding. My mom was a Tennessee mom though. But not barefoot. It's mother's day and I thought the image was appropriate b/c the young TN mom looks stoical, even valorous.

btw, ma'am: Happy Mother's Day. I hope you have a really good day.
[info]asakiyume wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 09:54 pm (UTC)
Thank you sir--I am having a lovely day :-)

Yes, that mother does look valorous. Do you read [info]sartorias's blog? She had a post, some time ago, about a friend of hers with an Appalachian mom, and that mom talking joyously about her happiness up one day at the top of the mountains--this despite so much hardship, materially, in her life. It was lovely. I
[info]merle_ wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 04:11 pm (UTC)
Hmm. This suggests they still listed Favorite Book as late as 2001. *shrug* I can't provide any corroboration of this, though, and just one google match is suspicious.
[info]brylcool wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 04:25 pm (UTC)
I bought a Playboy on my 18th. It was the Women of Enron issue. Though surely they were slightly airbrushed, the featured ladies were real and very attractive (my favorite was the brunette wearing a "naughty" suit-type outfit who mentioned her husband being amused by the whole thing). I still find the articles entertaining and bought the one with Shannen Doherty on the cover strictly for the piece on Howard Dean that George McGovern wrote. Every now and then there is a photo series with women actually smiling and looking pleased to be alive that I think are far superior to the types of things I find myself all too often downloading at home.
[info]miafedup wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 06:38 pm (UTC)
Strange you are blogging about this. I had a terrible experience, just last night. So I bought a Playboy while my friend waited out in the car...the last time I bought a Playboy was maybe five years ago. Somewhere around then.

Anyway, the men in the store (esp. behind the counter) all morphed into giggly, little girls when they saw me buy it. I don't get that reaction, I really don't. Men are weird.

And the Playboy was completely worthless. The women are...maybe 5% real?? 10%? I mean, seriously. They should save money and just generate computerized images of (their version) of an ideal women.

Major turn off, another expensive lesson learned.
[info]ebourland wrote:
May. 11th, 2008 07:21 pm (UTC)
It is a real turnoff. Playboy makes me never want to have sex ever again.
[info]kathryn_aka_kat wrote:
May. 12th, 2008 12:24 am (UTC)
There's a horribly fascinating article in the lastest New Yorker (May 12th) about Pascal Dangin, who is the acknowledged genius at "fixing" fashion and celebrity photographs. In the March Vogue, "he tweaked a nundred and forty four images." Some celebrities have him on fixed contract, to review any of their pictures. Nothing is real any more.
[info]descartes_rock wrote:
May. 12th, 2008 03:37 am (UTC)
That picture is so powerful. Immediately made me think Grapes of Wrath.

Was the skirt incident worth the embarassment? :)
[info]ebourland wrote:
May. 12th, 2008 01:23 pm (UTC)
>>>Was the skirt incident worth the embarassment? :)

Today? No. Diving under a teacher's skirt while class is in session is not an option. What a little cloddish skirtchaser I was.
(Anonymous) wrote:
May. 12th, 2008 09:56 am (UTC)
The photograph may have been taken either by Dorothea Lange or Walker Evans, if it was, indeed, taken in the Deep South during or around the time of the Great Depression. If it wasn't taken by either of those folks, it was probably taken in the 'style' of Lange or Evans...just a thought.
[info]machiavelli_f wrote:
May. 12th, 2008 02:48 pm (UTC)
Having a playboy from the month you were born is an awesome idea.
I wish I had one from the month I was born. That is very, very cool.
[info]ebourland wrote:
May. 13th, 2008 07:18 pm (UTC)
Try eBay. The issues later than the 50s are pretty easy to come by. Before 1960 they get spendy.
[info]aquarian_azalea wrote:
May. 12th, 2008 04:41 pm (UTC)
I recently bought a 1960-something Playboy on eBay for a friend's birthday, for an interview with a political figure. (They do have some good interviews, and I'm amazed that people who seem like they would be opposed to porn are willing to do interviews with them.) I looked through the magazine and the women really do look so different from today's. I don't know how much of that is due to technology like airbrushing, implants, and various other plastic surgery procedures; how much is due to more liberal use of face and body makeup, tanning booths, hair dye, fake eyelashes, hair extensions, etc; and how much is simply that they chose a different type of woman then. Pretty soon they won't need actual women to pose: seems like there should be enough technology to let them digitally combine part of one woman's body/face with part of another's, and create centerfolds that way.

I have no problem with the kind of porn where people take photos at home or make videos at home and send them to a magazine, website, etc., but I blame magazines like Playboy for some of the problems between men and women today.
[info]antinats wrote:
May. 14th, 2008 01:34 pm (UTC)
i bought an old issue of playboy at a fleamarket once. same deal. what happened? to them , to us?

Latest Month

July 2008
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags